Much of medical training is spent reading literature. This is mostly in the form of textbooks, primary research articles, or summaries of the most recent literature (UpToDate, etc.). We sit in seminars and absorb facts and spend our free time catching up on the stack of journals we get in the mail (my flights to see my husband are spent reading JAMA andPediatrics in Review). But though we have so little free time and so much to read, it may behoove us to pick up some literary fiction every once in a while.
Empathy and the ability to relate to our patients and colleagues is a crucial part of the practice of medicine, and multiple studies have found a correlation of increased empathy in those that read more literary fiction1. An increase in empathy scores based on various measures has even found to be inducible after reading literary fiction, but not nonfiction, popular fiction, or science fiction2-4. Literary fiction, in this case is literature that includes complex characters with nuances that require the reader to search for meaning. This is in contrast to popular fiction, in which the reader to read passively due to the fact that characters conform to expectations, as well as nonfiction, in which the prose very clearly lays out the exposition as opposed to requiring the reader to draw conclusions and make inferences4.
Reading literary fiction specifically has also been shown to improve vocabulary, general knowledge, and other verbal abilities and generally make more successful students starting at a young age5. But why is this so specific to literary fiction as opposed to anything else? Literary fiction is essentially a simulation of social worlds and contexts1,5. It allows us to follow the trajectories of human agents we care about and to become invested in their stories, but with none of the risk that comes with social investment in the real world1,4,6. Just like our relationships in real life, in social encounters we are forced to read between the lines and infer how characters are feeling based on their words and actions5,7,8. Since we are required to contribute our own voices, we consider our own perspectives within the context of the fictional world and actions4. And when the characters do not conform to our expectations of how we think they should behave, it makes us reassess our own expectations and assumptions5,6. This critical thinking enhances cultural competence, awakens curiosity, and increases empathy and self-awareness5-7. It also allows us to be more comfortable with uncertainty and ambiguity, two incredibly important characteristics in medicine, because we are experiencing it in such a low risk environment7.
In these social worlds, we are transported to situations and circumstances we would never experience otherwise, but we are still able to relate to characters and understand their experiences more fully, which then can be translated to our patients. It reduces the strangeness of others as we imagine ourselves in their shoes4. And it presents us with situations that may not have ever taken place but could conceivably occur in the future1.
I spent much of my time in college, graduate, and medical school reading medical nonfiction, not only because that is what interested me, but because I thought it would help me prepare for life as a physician. One the one hand, The Immortal Life of Henrietta Lacks by Rebecca Skloot does paint a pretty grim and compelling picture of systemic discrimination in the healthcare system in the United States while also proposing ethical questions about medical experimentation and ownership of tissue. However, The Death of Ivan Ilyich by Leo Tolstoy taught me about the pain a man experiences when no one acknowledges his impending death, not because it is explicitly mentioned, but because it can be seen in his words and actions at the end of his life. It stimulated my imagination to feel what he is feeling, just like I need to do with my own patients. Maybe next time I’m on a plane, I will put down my JAMA and pick up a novel.
References
- Oatley K. The cognitive science of fiction. WIREs Cogn Sci. 2012;3:425-430. doi: 10.1002/wcs.1185.
- Pino MC, Mazza M. The Use of “Literary Fiction” to Promote Mentalizing Ability. PLoS One. 2016;11(8):e0160254. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0160254.
- Bal PM, Veltkamp M. How Does Fiction Reading Influence Empathy? An Experimental Investigation on the Role of Emotional Transportation. PLoS One. 2013;8(1):e55341. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0055341.
- Comer Kidd D, Castano E. Reading Literary Fiction Improves Theory of Mind. Science. 2013;342(6156);377-380. doi: 10.1126/science.1239918.
- Oatley K. Fiction: Simulation of Social Worlds. Trends Cogn Sci. 2016;20(8):618-628. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2016.06.002.
- Saffran L. What Pauline Doesn’t Know: Using Guided Fiction Writing to Educate Health Professionals about Cultural Competence. J Med Humanit. 2018;39(3):275–283. doi:10.1007/s10912-016-9430-4.
- Johnson JM. Finding Time for Fiction. Acad Psychiatry. 2015;39(6):713-715. doi: 10.1007/s40596-015-0341-x.
- Seeman MV. The Psychological Uses of Fiction. Psychiatry. 62(1):83-90. doi: 10.1080/00332747.1999.11024855.